One-Stop Guide to Profiles with Spring Boot

Table Of Contents

Spring provides a mighty tool for grouping configuration properties into so-called profiles, allowing us to activate a bunch of configurations with a single profile parameter. Spring Boot builds on top of that by allowing us to configure and activate profiles externally.

Profiles are perfect for setting up our application for different environments, but they’re also tempting in other use cases.

Read on to learn how profiles work, what use cases they support and in which cases we should rather not use them.

Example Code

This article is accompanied by a working code example on GitHub.

What Do Profiles Control?

Activating a certain profile can have a huge effect on a Spring Boot application, but under the hood, a profile can merely control two things:

  • a profile may influence the application properties, and
  • a profile may influence which beans are loaded into the application context.

Let’s look at how to do both.

Profile-Specific Properties

In Spring Boot, we can create a file named application.yml that contains configuration properties for our application (we can also use a file named, but I’ll only refer to the YAML version from now on).

By default, if an application.yml file is found in the root of the classpath, or next to the executable JAR, the properties in this file will be made available in the Spring Boot application context.

Using profiles, we can create an additional file application-foo.yml whose properties will only be loaded when the foo profile is active.

Let’s look at an example. We have two YAML files:

// application.yml
helloMessage: "Hello!"
// application-foo.yml
helloMessage: "Hello Foo!"

And we have a Bean that takes the helloMessage property as a constructor argument:

class HelloBean {

  private static final Logger logger = ...;

  HelloBean(@Value("${helloMessage}") String helloMessage) {;


Depending on whether the foo profile is active, HelloBean will print a different message to the logger.

We can also specify all profiles in a single YAML file called application.yml using the multi-document syntax:

helloMessage: "Hello!"
    profiles: foo
helloMessage: "Hello Foo!"

By specifying the property spring.profiles in each section separated by --- we define the target profile for the properties in that section. If it’s missing, the properties belong to the default profile.

I’m a fan of using separate files, however, because it makes it much easier to find properties for a certain profile and even to compare them between profiles. Even the reference manual says that the multi-document syntax can lead to unexpected behavior.

Profile-Specific Beans

With properties, we can already control many things like connection strings to databases or URLs to external systems that should have different values in different profiles.

But with profiles, we can also control which beans are loaded into Spring’s application context.

Let’s look at an example:

class FooBean {

  private static final Logger logger = ...;

  void postConstruct(){"loaded FooBean!");


The FooBean is automatically picked up by Spring Boot’s classpath scan because we used the @Component annotation. But we’ll only see the log output in the postConstruct() method if the foo profile is active. Otherwise, the bean will not be instantiated and not be added to the application context.

It works similarly with beans defined via @Bean in a @Configuration class:

class BaseConfiguration {

  private static final Logger logger = ...;

  BarBean barBean() {
    return new BarBean();


The factory method barBean() will only be called if the bar profile is active. If the profile is not active, there will be no BarBean instance available in the application context.

Use Profile-Specific Beans Responsibly!

Adding certain beans to the application context for one profile, but not for another, can quickly add complexity to our application! We always have to pause and think if a bean is available in a particular profile or not, otherwise, this may cause NoSuchBeanDefinitionExceptions when other beans depend on it!

Most use cases can and should be implemented using profile-specific properties instead of profile-specific beans. This makes the configuration of our application easier to understand because everything specific to a profile is collected in a single application.yml file and we don't have to scan our codebase to find out which beans are actually loaded for which profile.

Read more about why you should avoid the @Profile annotation in this article.

How to Activate Profiles?

Spring only acts on a profile if it’s activated. Let’s look at the different ways to activate a profile.

The Default Profile

The default profile is always active. Spring Boot loads all properties in application.yml into the default profile. We could rename the configuration file to application-default.yml and it would work the same.

Other profiles will always be evaluated on top of the default profile. This means that if a property is defined in the default profile, but not in the foo profile, the property value will be populated from the default profile. This is very handy for defining default values that are valid across all profiles.

Via Environment Variable

To activate other profiles than the default profile, we have to let Spring know which profiles we want to activate.

The first way to do this is via the environment variable SPRING_PROFILES_ACTIVE:

java -jar profiles-0.0.1-SNAPSHOT.jar

This will activate the profiles foo and bar.

Via Java System Property

We can achieve the same using the Java system property

java -jar profiles-0.0.1-SNAPSHOT.jar

If the system property is set, the environment variable SPRING_PROFILES_ACTIVE will be ignored.

It’s important to put the -D... before the -jar..., otherwise the system property won’t have an effect.


We can also influence the profile of our application programmatically when starting the application:

public class ProfilesApplication {

  public static void main(String[] args) {
    SpringApplication application = 
      new SpringApplication(ProfilesApplication.class);


This will activate the baz profile in addition to all profiles that have been activated by either the environment variable or the system property.

I can’t think of a good use case that justifies this, though. It’s always better to configure the application using external environment variables or system properties instead of baking it into the code.

Activating a Profile in Tests with @ActiveProfiles

In tests, using system properties or environment variables to activate a profile would be very awkward, especially if we have different tests that need to activate different profiles.

The Spring Test library gives us the @ActiveProfiles annotation as an alternative. We simply annotate our test and the Spring context used for this test will have the specified profiles activated:

@ActiveProfiles({"foo", "bar"})
class FooBarProfileTest {

  void test() {
    // test something


It’s important to note that the @ActiveProfiles annotation will create a new application context for each combination of profiles that are encountered when running multiple tests. This means that the application context will not be re-used between tests with different profiles which will cause longer test times, depending on the size of the application.

Checking Which Profiles are Active

To check which profiles are active, we can simply have a look at the log output. Spring Boot logs the active profiles on each application start:

... i.r.profiles.ProfilesApplication: The following profiles are active: foo

We can also check which profiles are active programmatically:

class ProfileScannerBean {

  private static final Logger logger = ...;

  private Environment environment;

  ProfileScannerBean(Environment environment) {
    this.environment = environment;

  void postConstruct(){
    String[] activeProfiles = environment.getActiveProfiles();"active profiles: {}", Arrays.toString(activeProfiles));


We simply inject the Environment into a bean and call the getActiveProfiles() method to get all active profiles.

When To Use Profiles?

Now that we know how to use profiles let’s discuss in which cases we should use them.

Using a Profile for Each Environment

The prime use case for profiles is configuring our application for one of multiple environments.

Let’s discuss an example.

There might be a local environment that configures the application to run on the developer machine. This profile might configure a database url to point to localhost instead of to an external database. So we put the localhost URL into application-local.yml.

Then, there might be a prod profile for the production environment. This profile uses a real database and so we set the database url to connect to the real database in application-prod.yml.

I would advise putting an invalid value into the default profile (i.e. into application.yml) so that the application fails fast if we forget to override it in a profile-specific configuration. If we put a valid URL like test-db:1234 into the default profile we might get an ugly surprise when we forget to override it and the production environment unknowingly connects to the test database….

Our configuration files then might look like this:

# application.yml
database-url: "INVALID!"

# application-local.yml
database-url: "localhost:1234"

# application-prod.yml
database-url: "the-real-db:1234"

For each environment, we now have a pre-configured set of properties that we can simply activate using one of the methods above.

Using a Profile for Tests

Another sensible use case for profiles is creating a test profile to be used in Spring Boot integration tests. All we have to do to activate this profile in a test is to annotation the test class with @ActiveProfiles("test") and everything is set up for the test.

Using the same properties as above, our application-test.yml might look like this:

# application-test.yml
database-url: "jdbc:h2:mem:testDB"

We have set the database url to point to an in-memory database that is used during tests.

Basically, we have created an additional environment called test.

If we have a set of integration tests that interact with a test database, we might also want to create a separate integrationTest profile pointing to a different database:

# application-integrationTest.yml
database-url: "the-integration-db:1234"

Don't Re-Use Environments for Tests!

Don't re-use another environment (like `local`) for tests, even if the properties are the same. In this case, copy application-local.yml into application-test.yml and use the test profile. The properties will diverge at some point and we don't want to have to search which property values belong into which profile then!

When Not to Use Profiles?

Profiles are powerful and we might be tempted to use them for other use cases than the ones described above. Here’s my take on why that is a bad idea more often than not.

Don’t Use Profiles For “Application Modes”

This is probably debatable because profiles seem to be a perfect solution to this, but I would argue not to use profiles to create different “modes” of an application.

For example, our application could have a master mode and a worker mode. We’d create a master and a worker profile and add different beans to the application context depending on these profiles:

public class MasterConfiguration {
  // @Bean definitions needed for a master

public class WorkerConfiguration {
  // @Bean definitions needed for a worker

In a different use case, our application might have a mock mode, to be used in tests, that mocks all outgoing HTTP calls instead of calling the real services. We’d have a mock profile that replaces our output ports with mocks:

class BaseConfiguration {
  OutputPort mockedOutputPort(){
    return new MockedOutputPort();
  OutputPort realOutputPort(){
    return new RealOutputPort();


So, why do I consider this to be problematic?

First, we have to look into the code to see which profiles are available and what they do. That is if we haven’t documented them outside of the code, but who does that, right? We see these @Profile annotations in the code and ask ourselves what this profile does exactly. Each time. Better to use a set of properties that are clearly documented in application.yml and can be overridden for a specific environment or a specific test.

Second, we have a combinatorial effect when using profiles for multiple application modes. Which combinations of modes are compatible? Does the application still work when we combine the worker profile with the mock profile? What happens if we activate the master and the worker profile at the same time? We’re more likely to understand the effect of these combinations if we’re looking at them at a property level instead of at a profile level. So, again, a set of central properties in application.yml for the same effect is easier to grasp.

The final reason why I find this problematic is that we’re creating a different application with each profile! Each “mode” of the application needs to be tested with each valid combination of other “modes”. It’s easy to forget to test a specific combination of modes if they’re not aligned with the environment profiles.

Don’t Use Profiles For Feature Flags

For similar reasons, I believe that we shouldn’t use profiles for feature flags.

A feature flag is an on/off switch for a specific feature. We could model this as a profile enable-foo that controls the loading of a couple beans.

But if we use feature flags for what they’re intended (i.e. to enable trunk-based development and speed up our deployments), we’re bound to collect a bunch of feature flags over time. If we create a profile for each profile, we’ll be drowning in the combinatorial hell I described in the previous section.

Also, profiles are too cumbersome to evaluate at runtime. To check if a feature is enabled or disabled, we’ll have to use if/else blocks more often than not and to call environment.getActiveProfiles() for this check is awkward at best.

Better to configure a boolean property for each feature and inject it into our beans with @Value("${}") boolean featureEnabled.

Feature flags should be a simple property with a very narrow scope instead of an application-wide profile. Better yet, use a dedicated feature flag tool.

Don’t Use Profiles That Align With Environments

I’ve seen profiles like test-db (configures a database to be used in tests) and local-only (configures who knows what for local testing). These profiles clearly align with the test and the local environment, respectively. So, the database configuration in the test-db profile should move into the test profile, and the configuration in the local-only profile should move into the local profile.

As a general rule, profiles that contain the name of an environment in their name should be consolidated into a single profile with the name of that environment to reduce combinatorial effects. A few environment profiles are much easier to maintain than many profiles that we have to combine to create a valid environment configuration.

Don’t Use In application.yml!

As we’ve seen above, profiles are activated using the property. This is useful for external configuration via environment variable or similar.

We could also add the property to one of our application.yml files to activate a certain set of profiles by default.

This only works in the default application.yml file, however, and not in the profile-specific application-<profile>.yml files. Otherwise, in a profile, we could activate another set of profiles, which could activate another set of profiles, which could activate another set of profiles until no one knows where those profiles come from anymore. Spring Boot doesn’t support this profile-ception, and that’s a good thing!

So, using might lead to misunderstandings when developers expect to work in profile-specific YAML files.

Also, activating a profile in application.yml would make it active by default. If it’s active by default, why would we need a profile for it?


Profiles are a great tool to provide configuration properties for different environments like local development and a test, staging, and production environment. We create a set of properties we need, apply different values to those properties depending on the environment and activate the profile via command-line parameter or environment variable. In my opinion, this is the best (and should be the only) use of profiles.

As soon as we use profiles for different things like feature flags or application modes, things might get hard to understand and hard to maintain very quickly.

You can find the example code from this article on GitHub.

Use profiles for environments and think very hard before using a profile for something different.

Written By:

Tom Hombergs

Written By:

Tom Hombergs

As a professional software engineer, consultant, architect, general problem solver, I've been practicing the software craft for more than fifteen years and I'm still learning something new every day. I love sharing the things I learned, so you (and future me) can get a head start. That's why I founded

Recent Posts

Inheritance, Polymorphism, and Encapsulation in Kotlin

In the realm of object-oriented programming (OOP), Kotlin stands out as an expressive language that seamlessly integrates modern features with a concise syntax.

Read more

Publisher-Subscriber Pattern Using AWS SNS and SQS in Spring Boot

In an event-driven architecture where multiple microservices need to communicate with each other, the publisher-subscriber pattern provides an asynchronous communication model to achieve this.

Read more

Optimizing Node.js Application Performance with Caching

Endpoints or APIs that perform complex computations and handle large amounts of data face several performance and responsiveness challenges. This occurs because each request initiates a computation or data retrieval process from scratch, which can take time.

Read more