Integration Tests with @SpringBootTest

With the @SpringBootTest annotation, Spring Boot provides a convenient way to start up an application context to be used in a test. In this tutorial, we’ll discuss when to use @SpringBootTest and when to better use other tools for testing. We’ll also look into different ways to customize the application context and how to reduce test runtime.

Code Example

This article is accompanied by working example code on GitHub.

The “Testing with Spring Boot” Series

This tutorial is part of a series:

1. Unit Testing with Spring Boot
2. Testing Spring MVC Web Controllers with @WebMvcTest
3. Testing JPA Queries with @DataJpaTest
4. Integration Tests with @SpringBootTest

Dependencies

The code examples in this article only need the dependencies to Spring Boot’s test starter and to JUnit Jupiter:

dependencies {
	testCompile('org.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-test')
	testCompile('org.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter:5.4.0')
}

Integration Tests vs. Unit Tests

Before we start into integration tests with Spring Boot, let’s define what sets an integration test apart from a unit test.

A unit test covers a single “unit”, where a unit commonly is a single class, but can also be a cluster of cohesive classes that is tested in combination.

An integration test can be any of the following:

• a test that covers multiple “units”. It tests the interaction between two or more clusters of cohesive classes.
• a test that covers multiple layers. This is actually a specialization of the first case and might cover the interaction between a business service and the persistence layer, for instance.
• a test that covers the whole path through the application. In these tests, we send a request to the application and check that it responds correctly and has changed the database state according to our expectations.

Spring Boot provides the @SpringBootTest annotation which we can use to create an application context containing all the objects we need for all of the above test types. Note, however, that overusing @SpringBootTest might lead to very long-running test suites.

So, for simple tests that cover multiple units we should rather create plain tests, very similar to unit tests, in which we manually create the object graph needed for the test and mock away the rest. This way, Spring doesn’t fire up a whole application context each time the test is started.

For tests that cover integration with the web layer or persistence layer, we can use @WebMvcTest or @DataJpaTest instead. For integration with other layers, have a look at Spring Boot’s other test slice annotations. Note that these test slices will also take some time to boot up, though.

Finally, for tests that cover the whole Spring Boot application from incoming request to database, or tests that cover certain parts of the application that are hard to set up manually, we can and should use @SpringBootTest.

Creating an ApplicationContext with @SpringBootTest

@SpringBootTest by default starts searching in the current package of the test class and then searches upwards through the package structure, looking for a class annotated with @SpringBootConfiguration from which it then reads the configuration to create an application context. This class is usually our main application class since the @SpringBootApplication annotation includes the @SpringBootConfiguration annotation. It then creates an application context very similar to the one that would be started in a production environment.

We can customize this application context in many different ways, as described in the next section.

Because we have a full application context, including web controllers, Spring Data repositories, and data sources, @SpringBootTest is very convenient for integration tests that go through all layers of the application:

@ExtendWith(SpringExtension.class)
@SpringBootTest
@AutoConfigureMockMvc
class RegisterUseCaseIntegrationTest {

  @Autowired
  private MockMvc mockMvc;

  @Autowired
  private ObjectMapper objectMapper;

  @Autowired
  private UserRepository userRepository;

  @Test
  void registrationWorksThroughAllLayers() throws Exception {
    UserResource user = new UserResource("Zaphod", "zaphod@galaxy.net");

    mockMvc.perform(post("/forums/{forumId}/register", 42L)
            .contentType("application/json")
            .param("sendWelcomeMail", "true")
            .content(objectMapper.writeValueAsString(user)))
            .andExpect(status().isOk());

    UserEntity userEntity = userRepository.findByName("Zaphod");
    assertThat(userEntity.getEmail()).isEqualTo("zaphod@galaxy.net");
  }

}

Here, we additionally use @AutoConfigureMockMvc to add a MockMvc instance to the application context.

We use this MockMvc object to perform a POST request to our application and to verify that it responds as expected.

We then use the UserRepository from the application context to verify that the request has lead to an expected change in the state of the database.

Customizing the Application Context

We can turn a lot of knobs to customize the application context created by @SpringBootTest. Let’s see which options we have.

Adding Auto-Configurations

Above, we’ve already seen an auto-configuration in action:

@SpringBootTest
@AutoConfigureMockMvc
class RegisterUseCaseIntegrationTest {
  ...
}

There’s a lot of other auto-configurations available that each add other beans to the application context.

Setting Custom Configuration Properties

Often, in tests it’s necessary to set some configuration properties to a value that’s different from the value in a production setting:

@SpringBootTest(properties = "foo=bar")
class SpringBootPropertiesTest {

  @Value("${foo}")
  String foo;

  @Test
  void test(){
    assertThat(foo).isEqualTo("bar");
  }
}

If the property foo exists in the default setting, it will be overridden by the value bar for this test.

Externalizing Properties with @ActiveProfiles

If many of our tests need the same set of properties, we can create a configuration file application-<profile>.properties or application-<profile>.yml and load the properties from that file by activating a certain profile:

# application-test.yml
foo: bar

@SpringBootTest
@ActiveProfiles("test")
class SpringBootProfileTest {

  @Value("${foo}")
  String foo;

  @Test
  void test(){
    assertThat(foo).isEqualTo("bar");
  }
}

Setting Custom Properties with @TestPropertySource

Another way to customize a whole set of properties is with the @TestPropertySource annotation:

# src/test/resources/foo.properties
foo=bar

@SpringBootTest
@TestPropertySource(locations = "/foo.properties")
class SpringBootPropertySourceTest {

  @Value("${foo}")
  String foo;

  @Test
  void test(){
    assertThat(foo).isEqualTo("bar");
  }
}

All properties from the foo.properties file are loaded into the application context. @TestPropertySource also to configure a lot more.

Injecting Mocks with @MockBean

If we only want to test a certain part of the application instead of the whole path from incoming request to database, we can replace certain beans in the application context by using @MockBean:

@SpringBootTest
class MockBeanTest {

  @MockBean
  private UserRepository userRepository;

  @Autowired
  private RegisterUseCase registerUseCase;

  @Test
  void testRegister(){
    // given
    User user = new User("Zaphod", "zaphod@galaxy.net");
    boolean sendWelcomeMail = true;
    given(userRepository.save(any(UserEntity.class))).willReturn(userEntity(1L));

    // when
    Long userId = registerUseCase.registerUser(user, sendWelcomeMail);

    // then
    assertThat(userId).isEqualTo(1L);
  }
  
}

In this case, we have replaced the UserRepository bean with a mock. Using Mockito’s when method, we have specified the expected behavior for this mock in order to test a class that uses this repository.

You can read more about the @MockBean annotation in my article about mocking.

Adding Beans with @Import

If certain beans are not included in the default application context, but we need them in a test, we can import them using the @Import annotation:

package other.namespace;

@Component
public class Foo {
}

@SpringBootTest
@Import(other.namespace.Foo.class)
class SpringBootImportTest {

  @Autowired
  Foo foo;

  @Test
  void test() {
    assertThat(foo).isNotNull();
  }
}

By default, a Spring Boot application includes all components it finds within its package and sub-packages, so this will usually only be needed if we want to include beans from other packages.

Creating a Custom @SpringBootApplication

We can even create a whole custom Spring Boot application to start up in tests. If this application class is in the same package as the real application class, but in the test sources rather than the production sources, @SpringBootTest will find it before the actual application class and load the application context from this application instead.

Alternatively, we can tell Spring Boot which application class to use to create an application context:

@SpringBootTest(classes = CustomApplication.class)
class CustomApplicationTest {

}

When doing this, however, we’re testing an application context that may be completely different from the production environment, so this should be a last resort only when the production application cannot be started in a test environment. Usually, there are better ways, though, such as to make the real application context configurable to exclude beans that won’t start in a test environment. Let’s look at this in an example.

Let’s say we use the @EnableScheduling annotation on our application class. Each time the application context is started (even in tests), all @Scheduled jobs will be started and may conflict with our tests. We usually don’t want the jobs to run in tests, so we can create a second application class without the @EnabledScheduling annotation and use this in the tests. However, the better solution would be to create a configuration class that can be toggled with a property:

@Configuration
@EnableScheduling
@ConditionalOnProperty(
        name = "io.reflectoring.scheduling.enabled",
        havingValue = "true",
        matchIfMissing = true)
public class SchedulingConfiguration {
}

We have moved the @EnableScheduling annotation from our application class to this special confgiuration class. Setting the property io.reflectoring.scheduling.enabled to false will cause this class not to be loaded as part of the application context:

@SpringBootTest(properties = "io.reflectoring.scheduling.enabled=false")
class SchedulingTest {

  @Autowired(required = false)
  private SchedulingConfiguration schedulingConfiguration;

  @Test
  void test() {
    assertThat(schedulingConfiguration).isNull();
  }
}

We have now successfully deactivated the scheduled jobs in the tests. The property io.reflectoring.scheduling.enabled can be specified in any of the ways described above.

Why are my Integration Tests so slow?

A code base with a lot of @SpringBootTest-annotated tests may take quite some time to run. The Spring test support is smart enough to only create an application context once and re-use it in following tests, but if different tests need different application contexts, it will still create a separate context for each test, which takes some time for each test.

All of the customizing options described above will cause Spring to create a new application context. So, we might want to create one single configuration and use it for all tests so that the application context can be re-used.

If you’re interested in the time your tests spend for setup and Spring application contexts, you may want to have a look at JUnit Insights, which can be included in a Gradle or Maven build to produce a nice report about how your JUnit 5 tests spend their time.

Conclusion

@SpringBootTest is a very convenient method to set up an application context for tests that is very close the one we’ll have in production. There are a lot of options to customize this application context, but they should be used with care since we want our tests to run as close to production as possible.

@SpringBootTest brings the most value if we want to test the whole way through the application. For testing only certain slices or layers of the application, we have other options available.

The example code used in this article is available on github.

Follow me on Twitter, LinkedIn, or my Mailing List to be notified of new content.